Search for: All records

IEEE.org IEEE Xplore IEEE SA IEEE Spectrum More Sites Donate Cart Create Account Personal Sign In IEEE Xplore logo - Link to home MIT logo Access provided by: MIT Sign Out IEEE logo - Link to IEEE main site homepage Search by Content Type ADVANCED SEARCH Conferences >2025 IEEE 66th Annual Symposi... Collapsing Catalytic Classes PDF Michal Koucký; Ian Mertz; Edward Pyne; Sasha Sami All Authors Abstract Document Sections I. Introduction II. Catalytic Machines III. Main Technical theorem IV. Proof of Main Result Authors References Keywords Metrics Footnotes Abstract: A catalytic machine is a space-bounded Turing machine with additional access to a second, much larger work tape, with the caveat that this tape is full, and its contents must be preserved by the computation. Catalytic machines were defined by Buhrman et al. (STOC 2014), who, alongside many follow-up works, exhibited the power of catalytic space (CSPACE) and, in particular, catalytic logspace machines (CL) beyond that of traditional space-bounded machines. Several variants of CL have been proposed, including nondeterministic and co-non-deterministic catalytic computation by Buhrman et al. (STACS 2016) and randomized catalytic computation by Datta et al. (CSR 2020). These and other works proposed several questions, such as catalytic analogues of the theorems of Savitch and Immerman and Szelepcsényi. Catalytic computation was recently derandomized by Cook et al. (STOC 2025), but only in certain parameter regimes. We settle almost all questions regarding randomized and nondeterministic catalytic computation by giving an optimal reduction from catalytic space with additional resources to the corresponding non-catalytic space classes. With regards to non-determinism, our main result is that CL = CNL and with regards to randomness we show CL = CPrL where CPrL denotes randomized catalytic logspace where the accepting probability can be arbitrarily close to 1/2. We also have a number of near-optimal partial results for non-deterministic and randomized catalytic computation with less catalytic space. We show catalytic versions of Savitch’s theorem, Immerman-Szelepscényi, and the derandomization results of Nisan and Saks and Zhou, all of which are unconditional and hold for all parameter settings. Our results build on the compress-or-compute framework of Cook et al. (STOC 2025). Despite proving broader and stronger results, our framework is simpler and more modular.